Have you ever felt like something needs to be said but you chose not to say it for whatever reason?
This is me, doing what I feel needs to be done in order for us to progress as a nation. The internet landscape in Singapore is such that, most of the people who talk about politics are detractors of the government. In reality, as evidenced by election results, the majority of people in Singapore are happy with the government. Why is it then that you don't see more people sticking up for the government on websites like The Online Citizen(TOC) or The Temasek Review(TR)(Search Engine Optimisation at work here hahaha)?
The reasons for the majority being silent are manifold. For one, they may fear being abused online for expressing a differing opinion by the multitude of empty vessels that are online(of course here, I refer only to the empty vessels. Those who have many words to say but nothing of substance to contribute). Just a quick visit to sites like these(TOC and TR) and you'll notice an overwhelming tsunami of negativity. The moment someone even begins to show hints of support for the government, he/she is struck down and crushed like a cockroach(You'll have to imagine it like it's being said by Margaret Chan in Masters of the Sea). It's no wonder you'll almost never find a platform where rational discourse can be conducted about the state of Singapore politics.
Secondly, and more likely, they may be too comfortable in thinking that regardless of what the opposition supporters might say online, the support for the PAP is too strong for it to have any effect and thus, they don't need to do anything. Why expend energy on fighting a fight you think you'll win regardless of whether you do anything or not.
The consequence of allowing this to go on is far too tragic for me to sit idly by. If the Silent Majority doesn't speak out, net-savvy neutrals will be easily swayed to the nonsense(I am of course by no means suggesting that everything the opposition puts forth is nonsense) of the opposition and slowly but surely, if they don't hear a balanced perspective this will result in the real life effect of the incumbent government losing much valued votes simply because these neutrals are only exposed to one point of view and not because the opposition are necessarily better or more competent.
This is where I stick my neck out for my country. I'll take the flak, I'll take the criticisms, I'll take people calling me a PAP dog. As long as I can get even some people talking rationally and neutrally about the state of Singapore politics, I believe my job is done.
Here on this blog, I intend to be the voice of The Silent Majority. The views that I will express will entirely be my own. Some in the silent majority might disagree, in which case, they're more than welcome to express their own opinion and in doing so, the objective would have been achieved because they finally speak out.
The empty vessels of our little city state have carried on their cacophonous refrain for far too long. This is the first step to constructive discourse.
I commented on Aljunied GRC's FB post on this blog:
ReplyDeleteI thought the silent majority is by definition, silent.
It's a bit oxymoronic to have someone speak up on its behalf, or profess to do so.
Besides, how sure is he/she that it is a representation of their voice, when the latter is ....silent?
BT
The Silent Majority is the situation that we have now that must change. I can't be absolutely certain that my views and opinions perfectly mirror that of every single person in the Silent Majority, but I am sure that I am part of that community. Furthermore, if other people who are part of that Silent Majority speak up to say otherwise, then the objective has been achieved. The idea is to get more of these people talking and discussing issues so that online, we aren't subjected to the one sided rhetoric we see at every other website.
ReplyDeletethrough the whole passage i see nothing but direct attacks on the aggressive oppositions supporters and that oppositions are nonsense(of course i also will say you did not meant all)
ReplyDeleteu speak against one sided rhetoric of the internet platform, yet all that u displayed are not much of a multi perspective debate.
u said you are the representation of the silent majority, and yet you say all post are your very own views.
oh, and did you mention that majority of the silent majority are actually people who don't BOTHER?
prove me wrong, for i certainly can prove you right.. just grab a handful of shoppers in orchard road.. :)
"If the Silent Majority doesn't speak out, net-savvy neutrals will be easily swayed to the nonsense"-
ReplyDeleteIts like marketing, the more you get it out there, the more people buy into it. So yea, get your voice out there too. I support.
Keep it up! :)
Thanks for your comment J.Hao,
ReplyDeleteIf you would be kind enough to look at the internet landscape in its entirety, you will be pleased to find that an overwhelming majority of user-developed content that is relevant to politics is negative or even abusive towards the incumbent.
I am not against balanced discussions, as a matter of fact, I invite and welcome it.
When I say that all posts are my own views, these views reflect those of the silent majority simply because before I started this platform, I was one of those. Until I decided to speak up.
There is nothing to prove wrong sir? And if you can prove me right, all the better, because my entire point as stated in the post, is that the majority for 2 reasons don't speaking up, 1) for fear of abuse and 2) because of complacency.
@SuzeeBanshee
ReplyDeleteFight the good fight and spread the word about speakupsingapore.blogspot.com my friend. =-D
I agree. We shouldn't let the poison spread further.
ReplyDeleteNegativity is bred through the ruling party's inadequacies in accountability and transparency of their current regime.
ReplyDeleteFor this site to make a positive impression of the ruling party, first you will have to counter with facts and accurate analysis against the anti-establishment comments. I doubt anyone can do that effectively without sufficient data released by PAP.
No doubt most of the comments from TOC are totally negative towards PAP, do note that the commentaries by their actual writers have given pretty good analysis based on the statistics released.
As for TR, any neutral person who have a logical mind would know that they are totally geared towards discrediting the ruling party, so much so that most of it becomes nonsensical.
This is the reason why the PMO has gazetted TOC
and not TR. Lets not just stereotype political commentaries sites, else you might wanna include Talkingcock.com into the list as well.
Let's see if you can stand up to the test, enjoy. :D
Jetreroy, I appreciate your feedback and to be honest, I hope I can stand up to the test myself. I can't profess to be a political expert nor can I claim to know how to run our beloved island better than the current government. All I can do is detail why I agree or disagree with them.
ReplyDeleteToo late. Too little. Too optimistic.
ReplyDeleteJust stay silent. Shhh....